Podcast

Episode 152: How Freelancers Can Fix the “Forced-Hire” Scaling Mistake

By Zach Swinehart

In this episode, Zach breaks down how to escape the “panic hire” cycle by building a simple hiring funnel you can use before you hit capacity.

This includes evaluating candidates in a standardized way, using structured rubrics to protect your client work, and using your project manager (not you) as the filter in the process.

🚀 What You’ll Learn:

  • How to build a repeatable hiring funnel so you can confidently hire the right team members before you desperately need them.
  • The “feed more birds with one scone” content approach to building assets that simultaneously support hiring, onboarding, and client acquisition while you scale.
  • A real-life case study of a freelancer “in the trenches” delivering epic value to clients with productized services without doing the fulfillment to build a scaleable business vs. just a freelancer who owns a job.
  • Why your marketing and sales process should highlight the real cost of not using your proven system.
  • The overall mindset shift to go from ad-hoc freelancing to structured systems that protect your reputation, scale your business, and give you more clients without burning out.

💡 Ideal for Freelancers Looking to:

If you’re a six-figure freelancer sick of being maxed out on time, wanting to scale your business, and need to hire a freelancer (but are terrified of bad hires or losing client trust), this episode gives you the practical steps to hiring better.

Follow Zach:

AI-Generated Summary:

  • 0:00 – 2:00 — Zach tees up a chat with Bo about the common “forced-hire” scaling mistake and a system to de-stress hiring.
  • 2:00 – 4:00 — He frames a tweak to scoping + test projects that makes hiring faster, calmer, and proactive.
  • 4:00 – 6:00 — Zach previews “feed two birds with one scone”: turning hiring assets into marketing fuel and lead magnets.
  • 6:00 – 8:00 — Bo shares updates: new clients, onboarding a strong PM, and struggles finding a reliable ads manager.
  • 8:00 – 10:00 — Bo admits he’s been skipping formal trials, treating the first weeks as de facto tests with mixed results.
  • 10:00 – 12:00 — Zach suggests a structured, multi-step hiring flow and strategy-first trials to reduce risk and pressure.
  • 12:00 – 14:00 — He proposes review tasks (e.g., critique past campaigns) that reveal thinking without risking client work.
  • 14:00 – 16:00 — Bo notes AI muddies trial answers; Zach recommends paid micro-projects and Loom explanations to ensure depth.
  • 16:00 – 18:00 — Bo outlines his atomic ad testing: ICP call-outs, problem statements, and lead-magnet title tests.
  • 18:00 – 20:00 — Zach probes whether “atomic testing” is Bo’s proprietary method; Bo says it’s uncommon in practice.
  • 20:00 – 22:00 — They clarify outcomes: validated audiences, lead-magnet list, messaging doc, and a custom GPT for copy.
  • 22:00 – 24:00 — Bo explains deliverables: cheaper leads, validated messaging, and a first-draft copy system for scale.
  • 24:00 – 26:00 — Zach maps benefits to pains (e.g., wasted budget, vague messaging) using his Service Offering Thermometer.
  • 26:00 – 28:00 — Bo shares a cautionary tale: a month lost building a client’s unvalidated quiz that flopped.
  • 28:00 – 30:00 — Zach crystallizes benefits: lower CPL, avoid building unwanted lead magnets, and faster iteration.
  • 30:00 – 32:00 — He pitches making Bo’s method a dual-use asset: client-facing lead magnet + internal hire training.
  • 32:00 – 34:00 — Bo coins “feeding birds with scones”; they agree to package the process as training and an info asset.
  • 34:00 – 36:00 — Bo cites a case study: by refining messaging/audience, CPL dropped from ~$40–80 to ~$5 on LinkedIn.
  • 36:00 – 38:00 — They discuss downstream wins: better show-ups and sales from ICP-resonant copy (even if hard to quantify).
  • 38:00 – 40:00 — Zach asks how Bo tests lead magnets pre-build; Bo uses clicks to titles and a related existing opt-in.
  • 40:00 – 42:00 — Bo routes ad clicks to a relevant existing asset/newsletter to gauge interest without bait-and-switch.
  • 42:00 – 44:00 — Guardrails: only test lead magnets you could build in <24 hours; favor quizzes for segmentation data.
  • 44:00 – 46:00 — Bo designs quizzes to map outcomes to next steps (thank-you page offers) and tailored email paths.
  • 46:00 – 48:00 — They scope the trial: give creatives + results + rationale; ask candidates to synthesize next actions.
  • 48:00 – 50:00 — Bo would provide the testing flow, ads, metrics, and an SOP; candidate produces a messaging doc + plan.
  • 50:00 – 52:00 — Zach urges structured outputs with a rubric (must-hit insights) to score trial quality objectively.
  • 52:00 – 54:00 — On algorithm noise, Bo evens spend by pausing early winners at ~1K impressions to compare variants.
  • 54:00 – 56:00 — He acknowledges limits (not statistically bulletproof) but aims for fast, low-budget signal to de-risk.
  • 56:00 – 58:00 — Zach outlines what candidates need: what ran, how it performed, why it ran, and the extraction template.
  • 58:00 – 1:00:00 — Bo adds audience screenshots and asks for next-test ideas, valuing their reasoning about iterations.
  • 1:00:00 – 1:02:00 — Zach suggests a three-part mini-course (run tests, know when to move, act on results) starting with step 3.
  • 1:02:00 – 1:04:00 — He recommends a tiny unpaid/cheap pre-trial (5-min Loom) before a paid 3-hour synthesis project.
  • 1:04:00 – 1:06:00 — Bo wants to productize this offer to get out of bespoke audits and train a team on a repeatable method.
  • 1:06:00 – 1:08:00 — Zach closes with a takeaway prompt, then shares progress on his ClientForge/LeadTables SaaS and invites the 200KF waitlist.